![]() ![]() Because they have access to the White Raven school, however, they work fairly well with others. (IE they do damage.) They are a fighter with a touch of maneuvers. +Better armor +Access to fighter feats -Fewer maneuver schools -Fewer maneuvers -No ability to swap maneuvers -Not proficient with any ranged weapon (other than thrown.) Swordsage: +More maneuvers per ready +More maneuver schools +More exclusive maneuver schools +Monk's Wisdom to AC +Bonuses to damage on your favorite schools -Less armor -Poorer maneuver recharge (a feat mostly fixes this) -Less HP and less BAB -Is almost always feat starved -Several abilities can be duplicated by other classes (such as the identify ability) - Flavor and ability wise, the Warblade is a front line combatant that mixes it up in close quarters and tends to have their focused maneuvers. Also this means with one exotic weapon proficiency feat, you can wield any exotic weapon given time to change the feat. Here's my take on them, pluses and minuses, when compared to each other: Swordsage: +Has a easier time recharging skills +Can alter specific weapon feats (such as weapon focus) which can be handy when you find a great axe, but your feats are for the longsword. For instance if you take a class that has an armor restriction, such as almost any arcane caster, then the Swordsage, who gets the monk's wisdom bonus to AC, is a better choice. This depends at least partially on the other class you take. ![]() I can balance skills or hit die with my second class, so which I'm playing a gestalt campaign, and i was curious about the general opinion of taking only 1 martial adept class. She is on the Warblade Whacker Path Guide I rather enjoyed her gameplay actually.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |